Monkeypox (mpox) is a rare zoonotic contagious disease caused by the mpox virus (MPXV) [1]. The disease was nicknamed mpox because the MPXV was initially discovered in monkeys [2]. Although mpox was initially regarded as an animal infectious disease, the MPXV has revealed wide species tropism [3].
Several mpox outbreaks have occurred worldwide [4-7]. The earlier endemic outbreaks as a zoonotic disease occurred in some endemic African countries, such as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) [8] and the Republic of the Congo (ROC) [9], and in the United States of America following contacts of MPXV-infected animals from the endemic foreign countries [7]. On September 2017, however, the first suspected case of human-to-human transmitted mpox was reported in Nigeria [9]. Between 2018 and 2019, two men who recently traveled to the UK from Nigeria [10], one man in Israel who also traveled from Nigeria [11], and one Nigerian man in Singapore [12] were diagnosed with human mpox. The four infected men might cross the boundary of the endemic areas. On May 2022, human mpox was abruptly reported across Europe in men who had not recently traveled into the endemic countries and were not exposed to infected animals. The number of infected cases has grown to more than 86,930 persons in mid-April 2023 across 110 countries (Supplementary Table 1) [13].
The rapid increase in mpox-infected cases reported in non-endemic areas suggests personal transmission without links to animal sources. Indeed, this current outbreak has occurred among men who have sex with men (MSM), and the major transmission route may be sexual intercourse [6,14-20]. Although the outbreak has been found primarily in MSM and bisexual men with high-risk behaviors, some heterosexual casual sex partners can also be infected through bisexual men [17].
The classic pathogenesis of mpox is composed of four stages: incubation, prodromal, skin eruption, and healing stages [5,21,22]. Clinical manifestations of mpox are inconsistent among the outbreaks; more severe or critical symptoms were reported in earlier outbreaks in DRC or ROC, whereas less severe or mild clinical manifestations were reported in cases of the recent global outbreak [5,21,22]. Moreover, some recently infected cases have not revealed the sequential four stages in skin lesions, and their skin lesions occurred primarily in the genital and perianal sites [5,6,14,15]. The divergent clinical courses or manifestations between two types of infection may come from different modes of transmission, skin color of the affected persons, accessible medical care systems among counties, different genetic characteristics of the MPXV, and prevalence of prior smallpox vaccination [21,22].
With the international interventions for curbing the transmission of the infection after the first notification in 2022, the incidence of new infections has just passed the peak [13]. On the other hand, phylogenetic epidemiologic studies suggest that the recent outbreak worldwide can be controlled with appropriate interventions, but the infection cannot be eradicated. MPXV may hide in unexposed social networks and survive within the connections. Indeed, of the ten total mpox infections reported thus far in Korea, five were locally transmitted mpox cases. The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) concluded that the cases resulted from community transmission, as these new patients had not traveled overseas in the past three months. In the past, human mpox was treated as a regional crisis in some endemic counties [4,7-9]. On the other hand, the recent outbreak mostly affected MSMs and bisexual men exhibiting high-risk behaviors. Mpox is not a gay disease anymore; the MPXV can be transmitted to anyone. Therefore, everybody should be concerned about viral zoonotic diseases [6].
Although national guidelines against human mpox should be updated as rapidly as possible, national authorities must circulate the new infection information to medical practitioners. On the other hand, in reality, this is not the case. Therefore, medical specialists must know the characteristics of the infection because patients with this contagious disease may visit their offices with some genital lesions or other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Unrecognized or late-diagnosed infections may spread the infection to practitioners and their society. Spreading the MPXV can be overcome by knowledge-sharing and improved awareness among the population and healthcare providers. The clinical information from this paper may broaden and deepen the understanding of human mpox to curb early transmission and control the infection in the near future.
The genome of MPXV is composed of double-stranded DNA and belongs to the family of Poxviridae [23]. Under evolutional pressure, the genomes of MPXV are mutated less frequently than those of RNA viruses, such as coronavirus. The genetic information of MPXV has approximately 200,000-250,000 bp and 170-210 protein-coding genes [24].
The reported MPXV genomes can be classified phylo-genetically into three clades: two old clades (A.1 and A.2) from the earlier outbreaks and a newly emerging clade from the global outbreak in 2022 (B.1) [25,26]. The epidemiological features in genomes between clades A and B are different (Fig. 1) [25,26]. The DRC clade (A.1) and ROC clade (A.2) caused endemic diseases in sporadic outbreaks in many parts of Central and West Africa and the United States of America. In contrast to the earlier strains, the MPXV strains (clade B.1) in the 2022 outbreak are tightly clustered together by phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1) [25]. The genetically tight clustering suggests that the outbreak in 2022 may have originated from one hidden source. In particular, the MPXV sequence of ON676708 (USA_2021_MD) from a case who traveled from Nigeria to the United States in 2021 was placed phylogenetically between the sequences of strains in 2018-2019 and 2022 (Fig. 1) and the MPXV case of ON676707 (USA_2021_TX) was genetically identical to that of ON674051 (USA_2022_FL) and ON675438 (USA_2022_VA). These three DNA sequences between 2021 and 2022 have a genetic linkage with a large outbreak that occurred in Nigeria in 2017-2018 and the export of the MPXV in 2018 and 2019 from Nigeria to the United Kingdom, Israel, and Singapore (Fig. 1) [10-12,25]. Therefore, the emergence of the 2022 outbreak may have resulted from the importation of this MPXV from one hidden source that potentially emerged from the continuously cryptic circulation of the same virus that caused the 2017-2018 outbreak in Nigeria. Finally, the virus was introduced into an unknown MSM community exhibiting high-risk behavior and has continued circulating within the core community and exported into European countries in 2022 (Fig. 2).
These phylogenetic epidemiologic studies may suggest that although the recent outbreak could be controlled with appropriate interventions, the infection could not be eradicated. MPXV may hide in unexposed social networks, waiting for a ripe opportunity (Fig. 2).
The clinical features between the two clades are also different [6,7,15,21,22,27]. The overall mortality rate of human mpox infection was 8.7% of infected cases, with a significant difference between the Central African clade (10.6%) and the West African clade (3.6%) [1,27]. In addition, the reproduction number R0 for the Central African type was estimated to be 0.6-1.0 [1,28,29], and the R0 for the Western type may be lower than that of the central clade. R0>1 indicates that the pathogen has an epidemic potential in society [28,30]. In contrast, the lower R0 in the recent outbreak means an unlikely expanding personal trans-mission of mpox in an anonymous society and a lower possibility of inter-familial transmission [27-31].
MPXV is a member of the human orthopoxvirus family, along with variola, cowpox, and vaccinia viruses [23]. MPXV is genetically similar to smallpox by the variola virus, but has milder skin lesions and a lower mortality [32]. Therefore, one infection among orthopoxviruses may substantially protect against mpox, and vaccination with the vaccinia virus against the smallpox virus can simultaneously protect against mpox through shared immunologic mechanisms [33]. Since the vaccination for smallpox was globally suspended in 1978, individuals who lack vaccine-induced immunity have no cross-protective immunity to various orthopoxviruses [34]. Therefore, the changes in vaccination policy may induce the recent globally increased frequency of human mpox cases.
Smallpox vaccination cannot achieve 100% protection against mpox but can provide approximately 85% cross-pro-tection [6,35]. The clinical course in mpox-infected persons vaccinated against smallpox differs significantly from those in unvaccinated subjects. The symptoms and signs of mpox in vaccinated persons are milder than those of unvaccinated persons [6,35]. The incubation period of mpox is 7-21 days [22]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended mpox vaccination within two weeks, ideally before four days, after significant, unprotected exposure to a confirmed human case because of the relatively long incubation period. On the other hand, mpox is reported frequently in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), which may compromise the host immunity against infections [36-38]. People who are at higher potential for exposure to MPXV may be offered vaccination to help prevent mpox disease. Two vaccines may be used for the prevention of mpox disease: JYNNEOS vaccine and ACAM2000 vaccine are approved for the prevention of mpox and smallpox [39].
MPXV has wide host tropism to propagate the virus into susceptible species [40,41]. Some primates and domesticated animals are susceptible to the MPXV (Supplementary Table 2) [3]. MPXV can be transmitted by direct contact with blood and bodily fluids of infected animals. Hunting wild animals and the cooking and consumption of infected meat or bushmeat are well-known zoonotic routes of transmission [8,22]. In addition, exposed animals with MPXV can be reservoirs for future outbreaks because of its wide species tropism. Therefore, possible spillover events to domesticated animals may be an important issue of hidden reservoirs [3].
2) Human-to-human transmissionMPXV can spread to anyone through intimate contact via skin lesions and bodily fluids from infected persons [6,22]. Contaminated touching objects and fabrics (clothing, bedding, or towels) can spread the MPXV less frequently [42]. Sexual intercourse is considered a major transmission route. The intercourse constitutes close or intimate contact, often skin-to-skin contact, and physiological responses during sexual stimulation, such as increased respiratory rates or deep respiration, prolonged face-to-face contact, kissing, touching, sweating, massage, increased secretion from genital organs that can be routes of heavily spreading the viral particles to sex partners [43,44]. Consequently, all activities during sex can be significant risk factors for spreading the MPXVs to sex partners. The current outbreak was reported mainly among MSM and can be transmitted during sexual intercourse [6,15]. This direct contact in MSMs can occur during intimate contacts, such as oral, anal, or touching the genitals of a person with mpox [45].
The clinical course of mpox is traditionally composed of four stages: incubation, prodromal, skin eruption, and healing stages [5,6,22,46]. MPXV can be inoculated into various lesions depending on the transmission routes. In cases of zoonotic transmission, the initial inoculated lesions must be the biting or scratching sites on human skin [7]. In cases of personal transmission via intercourse, however, initial inoculated lesions must be in the genital and anorectal areas or oral mucosa, depending on patterns of intercourse. Mpox-infected people receive a single skin lesion or multiple lesions that may be located on or near the penis, scrotum, or anus in men and the labia, vagina, or anus in women with different evolution stages of skin lesions [5,6,14,15, 19,47]. The infected lesions can evolve into perianal abscesses, incurring proctitis and ulcers in the oral cavity, incurring poor oral intake [48]. As the MPXVs in inoculated site circulate into the regional lymph nodes through nearby lymphatics, the infected person can feel painful cervical lymph node swelling or frequent inguinal lymph node swelling (Fig. 3) [5,7,22].
After incubation for 7-21 days, infected persons can present with prodromal symptoms [6,22]. The systemic symptoms through initial viremia are fever, chills, exhaustion, malaise, respiratory symptoms (e.g., sore throat, nasal congestion, or cough), headache, muscular pain, or back pain. Sometimes, people have flu-like symptoms before the rash or may experience all or only a few symptoms or no prodromal symptoms [5,6,46].
Secondary skin eruptions occurred frequently. The rash can initially look like pimples or blisters and may be painful or itchy. The rash will go through four stages (macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules) before scabbing over and desquamation on areas, such as the hands, feet, chest, face, or mouth [22,49]. A person with mpox can spread MPXVs to others from when symptoms start until the rash fully recovers. The illness typically lasts 2-4 weeks [22,45,49].
The clinical presentations differed between the outbreak in 2022 and the outbreak in 2018-2020 [1,4-6,9,35]. Divergent clinical presentations could be caused by transmission mode, the virulence of MPXV strains, the prevalence of prior smallpox vaccinations, and the initial health of the individuals. From two typical outbreaks, more severe symptoms or signs were reported in the 2018-2020 outbreak than in the 2022 outbreak. Fever as a prodromal symptom is milder or often occurs in the 2022 outbreak. Lymph node swellings were frequently found in neck or cervical lymphatics in the earlier outbreak, whereas inguinal lymphadenopathies were mainly noted in 2022. Skin lesions have been described predominantly on the limbs or face for individuals with the earlier outbreak, whereas only two-thirds of cases in the last outbreak had genital involvement. The skin lesions in 2022 are found in limited numbers with pleomorphic stages, distributed mostly in one or two anatomical sites, such as penile or perianal involvement. In contrast, the lesions in the earlier eruptions were predominantly on the face and neck, with higher numbers and monomorphisms or stage by stage in skin eruptions. Previous reports have consistently reported that the outbreak in 2022 generally showed mild illness with smaller rates of prodromal symptoms than the previous outbreak. Consequently, some patients in the recent outbreak may have a window period for surveillance because those prodromal symptoms might be mild or not even noticed at all, and some individuals may not be aware of any symptoms until the appearance of the rash. Therefore, current detailing acute symptoms for the case definition of mpox should be reviewed to adapt best to the current findings [26]. Indeed, the case definition for mpox has not been standardized worldwide.
Close physical contact during intercourse could result in an infection [5,6,43,44]. The infected persons in the 2022 outbreak involved high-risk sexual behaviors. They had approximately five sex partners in the previous three months; 20% of patients reported chemsex in the previous month, and 32% visited a sex-on-site event in the previous month [6]. Consequently, a high rate of other concurrent STIs was observed in infected patients, such as gonococcal or chlamydial infections in the pharyngeal, urethral, and rectal areas or combined lesions or concurrent STIs [5,6]. A HIV infection has more severe skin lesions associated with genital ulcers than HIV-negative individuals [9].
Differential diagnostic processes are imperative for precise diagnosis, early recognition, and public health control of mpox infections [5]. Certain patients in the 2022 outbreak revealed a single penile skin lesion mimicking chancre in primary syphilis. Herpes simplex virus can be a concomitant STI or lesion mimicking mpox [5,6]. In addition, severe chickenpox with lesions in the palms and soles can be a primary differential diagnosis in mpox infections [50]. The lesions in chickenpox are more superficial and occur in clusters of the same stage, with denser manifestations on the trunk than on the face and extremities [50]. The symptoms and signs of the 2022 outbreak were nonspecific. Therefore, other varieties of differential diagnoses should be considered, ranging from chickenpox, molluscum contagiosum, measles, rickettsial infections, bacterial skin infections (such as those caused by
MPXV revealed various tissue tropisms [19,27,48,51]. Optimal clinical specimens for laboratory analyses depend on the disease stages or infectious routes. Four typical skin lesions are used frequently because the skin lesions occur frequently, can be harvested easily, and have high viral loads in the lesions (Fig. 4). In addition to the skin lesions, MPXV DNA was detected in the saliva or oral mucosal swab, rectal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, semen, urine, and feces [19,48]. The viral loads from various samples depend on the infec-tious routes and disease stages [51]. Interestingly, MPXVs are consistently isolated in semen during the pathogenesis of a mpox infection [51]. Although pathogenicity by semen or vaginal fluids has not yet been established, the presence in secretions can support the potential for sexual transmission [18,19]. Therefore, The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) guidelines have advised condom use for eight weeks after infection, but the potential duration and infectiousness of viral shedding in semen requires further study [6].
A variety of methods have been developed for mpox infections. Nucleic acid detection of the MPXV by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) is the preferred method for routine diagnosis [6,52]. This amplification test is conducted in a biosafety level-three facility [53]. The genetically conserved areas for amplification contain the extracellular-envelope protein gene (B6R) [52], DNA polymerase gene, E9L [54], DNA-depen-dent RNA polymerase subunit 18, rpo18 [55], and F3L gene [56]. The restriction length fragment polymorphism (RFLP) of PCR-amplified genes or gene fragments is also used to detect MPXV DNA [57], but RFLP is time-consuming and requires a virus culture. Whole-genome sequencing, using next-generation sequencing technologies, remains the gold standard for the diagnosis and genetic characterization of MPXV [25]. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) can detect the MPXV IgM and IgG antibodies in the serum [58]. On the other hand, the specificity is insufficient because of the antigenic cross-reaction between MPXV and other orthopoxviruses [1,58].
The measures for infection control have played decisive roles in preventing personal spreading in human society. Improved protection facilities, isolation practices, and adequate education are essential to curb personal trans-mission. MPXV is not heat-resistant and can be inactivated after 30 minutes of treatment at 56℃. The virus is inactivated easily by organic solvents, such as formaldehyde, methanol, sodium dodecyl sulfonate, phenol, and chloroform [59]. MPXV is resistant to drying and low temperature and can maintain vitality for a long time at 4℃ [23].
Mpox was previously an endemic disease in only a few countries. Mpox infections may be an epidemic disease in certain societies with high-risk sexual behaviors. Mpox may be a new emerging STI in high-risk groups worldwide. Owing to the unique patterns of transmission and divergent manifestations in the recent outbreak, urologists must know the characteristics of the infection because patients with mpox may visit their offices with some genital lesions or other STIs. As mpox DNA can be detected in the seminal fluid of infected men, the long-term effect of MPXV in the genital organs needs to be examined. The clinical infor-mation from this paper may deepen the understanding of human mpox and curb the early transmission of the infection.
No funding to declare.
Supplementary data can be found via https://doi.org/10.14777/uti.2023.18.2.35.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.