search for




 

Impact of the Human Microbiome on Nephrolithiasis
Urogenit Tract Infect 2021 Aug;16(2):25-31
Published online August 31, 2021;  https://doi.org/10.14777/uti.2021.16.2.25
Copyright © 2021 Korean Association of Urogenital Tract Infection and Inflammation.

Hae Do Jung, Joo Yong Lee1,2

Department of Urology, Wonkwang University Sanbon Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Gunpo, 1Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 2Center of Evidence Based Medicine, Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to: Joo Yong Lee
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-1767
Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2228-2320, Fax: +82-2-312-2538
E-mail: joouro@yuhs.ac
Received August 11, 2021; Revised August 19, 2021; Accepted August 19, 2021.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Nephrolithiasis has many causes, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide. The interest in the human microbiome is growing because of the advance of new diagnostic techniques, and recent studies have suggested a link between the microbiome and nephrolithiasis. This paper reviewed the role of the microbiome in nephrolithiasis. The absence of Oxalobacter formigenes induces hyperoxaluria, which promotes calcium oxalate stone (CaOx) formation. Escherichia coli promote CaOx supersaturation through hypocitraturia caused by the bacterial production of citrate lyase. Infection stones are associated with urea-splitting organisms, particularly Proteus mirabilis, and the stones themselves contain many species of bacteria.
Keywords : Microbiota; Nephrolithiasis; Gastrointestinal microbiome
INTRODUCTION

Nephrolithiasis is one of the most frequently encountered urologic diseases, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing worldwide. The prevention of nephrolithiasis is essential, but its etiology is variable and complex, involving geographical, climatic, ethnic, dietary, and genetic factors [1].

Attention to the contributions of the gastrointestinal and urinary microbiome in nephrolithiasis has increased recently [2]. Lederberg and McCray [3] first defined the microbiome as the ecological community of commensal, symbiotic, and pathogenic microorganisms sharing the body space. Advances in molecular techniques have enabled a more comprehensive assessment of the microorganisms present in urine [4]. 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing can identify bacteria in healthy urine [5-8]. Expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC) resolves the discrepancies between cultures and molecular assays. EQUC can also determine if the bacteria in urine are alive [5].

The Human Microbiome Project (HMP) was launched in 2008 to explore microbial communities and their connections with their human hosts [9]. On the other hand, the bladder was not included in the HMP initially. Samples were collected from the airways, skin, oral cavity, gut, and vagina [9]. Urine has historically been considered sterile in healthy individuals, but urine contains a variety of bacteria. These bacteria are not routinely cultivated but can be identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing [10-12]. This paper reviewed the role of the microbiome in nephrolithiasis.

MAIN BODY

1. Pathophysiology of Urinary Stone Formation

The stone formation process involves precipitation, nucleation, crystal growth, and crystal aggregation [13]. Urinary supersaturation and crystallization cause intrarenal crystal precipitation [14]. Calcium, oxalate, urate, and phosphate ions promote crystallization, and magnesium, citrate, pyrophosphate inhibit crystallization [15-17]. There are three hypotheses regarding the mechanisms of lithogenesis.

1) Randall’s plaque hypothesis

In 1937, Randall described [18] crystal growth from calcium phosphate plaques (Randall’s plaques) in the interstitium within the renal papilla at the base of the calyx in the kidney. Randall’s plaques are the first step toward calcium oxalate (CaOx) stone formation [14]. Damage to the renal tubular epithelium exposes the plaque to supersaturated urine, allowing CaOx stones to grow [19].

2) The free particle theory

In 1994, Kok and Khan [20] reported that large free crystalline particles could form in the long loop of Henle during normal transit time through the kidney. These particles obstruct the collecting ducts and form the nidus of a stone.

3) The fixed particle theory

Crystals attach to the renal tubular epithelium, leading to epithelial damage, nucleation, contact of nuclei with supersaturated urine, and crystal development. Brushite, cystine, and carbonate apatite crystals obstruct the inner medullary collecting ducts and ducts of Bellini, causing epithelial cell damage, inflammation, and focal interstitial fibrosis [21-23]. 

2. The Human Microbiome Project

The human body contains at least ten times more bacteria than human cells, and most bacteria are found in the human gut [24]. The HMP Consortium, which is an alliance of a broad collection of scientific experts funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), was set up to study the relationship between the microbiome and human hosts [9]. The goals of the HMP are to form standardized resources for microbiome analysis, provide microbiome data to the scientific community for disease research, and promote the development of new technologies for microbiome analysis [25]. The project’s initial data contained 4,788 samples from 242 screened and phenotyped adults (129 males, 113 females). 16S rRNA gene sequencing and whole-genome shotgun sequencing were used for analysis [26]. Microbiome samples were collected from 15 distinct body sites in both men and women. Three additional sites in the vagina were included for females [26]. The specimens included the oral cavity and oropharynx, skin, and stool [26]. The HMP currently aims to sequence at least 3,000 reference microbial genomes relevant to the human body and make them available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information and the Data Analysis and Coordination Center (http://hmpdacc.org/HMRGD) [9]. It will also offer a database to support future research [25].

3. Gut Microbiome and Urolithiasis

1) Bacteria that degrade oxalate

Oxalobacter formigenes rely on oxalate in the intestines as a carbon source for energy and growth [27]. In the US, O. formigenes colonizes 38-62% of adults. In India and Korea, the colonization percentage in adults is approximately 60% and 77%, respectively [28,29]. Dawson et al. [30] isolated anaerobic bacteria from sheep rumen, later defined as O. formigenes that relied on oxalate for energy. Allison et al. [31] described the same bacteria from human feces. The clinical results indicated a direct connection between the organism’s absence, hyperoxaluria, and the formation of oxalate stones. Numerous oxalate-degrading bacteria exist, such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, Clostridium, Eggerthella, Providencia, Streptococcus, and Leuconostoc genera [32]. Increased oxalate degradation by the gastrointestinal microbiome may decrease oxalate absorption and reduce urinary oxalate excretion [33].

Siener et al. [34] suggested that the absence of O. formigenes induces hyperoxaluria, which may cause the formation of CaOx stones. Of 37 idiopathic CaOx stone patients, only 11 (30%) tested positive for O. formigenes, while 26 (70%) were negative in the stool culture and stool polymerase chain reaction. Moreover, 60-80% of patients who formed multiple stones were negative for O. formigenes. On the other hand, there were no differences in 24-hour urine oxalate between O. formigenes-negative and O. formigenes-positive. This result contradicts the previously assumed mechanism through which the absence of O. formigenes, as described previously, causes hyperoxaluria. Ticinesi et al. [35] analyzed the microbiome composition through 16S rRNA microbial profiling and shotgun metagenomics analysis of fecal samples from 52 idiopathic calcium stone formers and 48 controls. Three taxa (Dorea, Enterobacter, and Faecalibacterium) were underrepresented in stone formers (p<0.05). Very few O. formigenes were detected in analyzed fecal samples (<0.001% in all samples), and the average relative abundance of O. formigenes was similar between stone formers and controls. The relative abundances of five taxa (Defluviitaleaceae, Catabacter, Anaerofilum, Sutterella, and Peptococcus) were significantly associated with the 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion in both stone formers and controls. Defluviitaleaceae, Sutterella, and Peptococcus showed a positive association, while Catabacter and Anaerofilum showed a negative association. Bacteroides, Actinobacteria, Alistipesindistinctus, and Odoribactersplanchnicus were more abundant in nephrolithiasis patients than the healthy controls [36]. The fecal samples of stone formers had a significantly lower bacterial representation of genes related to oxalate degradation, and gene expression was inversely correlated with the 24-hour oxalate excretion (r=−0.87, p=0.002). Oxalate-degrading genes were expressed in several bacterial species, and gene expression was inversely correlated with oxaluria (r=−0.85, p=0.02). Faecalibacterium produces short-chain fatty acids that attenuate inflammation and oxidative stress associated with kidney stone formation [37].

Batagello et al. [38] performed a meta-analysis of the gut microbiome in nephrolithiasis. They concluded that O. formigenes was not a good predictor of the nephrolithiasis risk. Although studies consistently reported a higher level of colonized O. formigenes in healthy controls than urinary stone patients, six out of 14 studies reported no significant impact of O. formigenes on the urinary oxalate levels. O. formigenes colonization ranged from 11% to 100% in healthy controls and 0% to 100% in urinary stone patients. They concluded that targeting a broad diversity of bacteria is necessary for microbiome analysis rather than focusing on a few species. 

4. Urinary Microbiome and Stones

1) Escherichia coli

High-throughput sequencing has shown that nephrolithiasis involves the Enterobacteriaceae genus in the urinary microbiome, including E. coli species [39]. Barr-Beare et al. [40] reported associations between E. coli and renal CaOx deposits. Mice with uropathogenic E. coli inoculation had a 2.7 times higher rate of calcium deposition. Several theories can explain the association between urinary bacteria and nephrolithiasis. The bacteria may adhere to CaOx crystals and cause pyelonephritis, and the resulting biofilm may promote crystal agglomerations. In addition, CaOx supersaturation in hypocitraturia caused by the bacterial production of citrate lyase may encourage stone formation [40-42].

2) Urea-splitting organisms

Organisms, including Proteus, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas, decompose urea in urine. The decom-position generates ammonia, bicarbonate, and carbonate, alkalizing the urine. These decomposition products form crystals with calcium, magnesium, and phosphoric acid in the urine that form infection stones (struvite or carbonate apatite) [43,44]. The bacterium most commonly associated with infection stones is Proteus mirabilis [45]. 

5. Microbiome in Stones

Bacteria can be isolated from approximately 15-70% of stones [46-48]. CaOx stones contained positive cultures in 13% to 44% of samples. E. coli (15-35%) was the most common bacteria identified from stone cultures, followed by Pseudomonas spp. and Proteus (urease-producing bacteria), which are typically associated with the formation of struvite stones [46,47].

Dornbier et al. [49] analyzed the microbiome of calcium-based urinary stones. They identified the urine and stone microbiota of nephrolithiasis patients using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and EQUC. Bacteria were identified in 29/52 (55.8%) of stones. Enterobacteriaceae (including the genera Escherichia and Klebsiella), Staphylococcus, Veillonella, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, Haemophilus, Proteus, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium were dominant the bacterial taxa. Twelve stones contained dominant bacterial taxa, and 5/12 (41.7%) of these were CaOx stones. In contrast, 36/40 (90%) of stones without dominant taxa were CaOx. EQUC and 16S-rRNA gene sequencing identified multiple enriched bacterial species, including Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli (a member of the family Enterobacteriaceae), and Lactobacillus gasseri. Dornbier et al. [49] developed a methodology to detect bacteria in stones and estimate whether they are more abundant in the urine than other species. Table 1 lists the microbiome associated with nephrolithiasis.

Table 1 Microbiome associated with nephrolithiasis.

Gut microbiome Urinary microbiome Stone microbiome
Known oxalate-degrading bacteriaEscherichia coliStaphylococcus, Veillonella, Streptococcus
Oxalobacter formigenesUrea-splitting organisms (Proteus, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas)Corynebacterium, Haemophilus, Proteus
LactobacillusLactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterobacteriaceae
Bifidobacterium
Enterococcus
Clostridium
Eggerthella
Providencia
Streptococcus
Leuconostoc
Related to 24-hour urine oxalate excretion
Defluviitaleaceae
Catabacter
Anaerofilum
Sutterella
Peptococcus
Lower in stone formers
Dorea
Faecalibacterium
Enterobacter
Higher in stone formers
Bacteroidetes
Acinobacteria
Alistipesindistinctus
Odoribactersplanchnicus


6. Standardization of Microbiome Studies for Nephrolithiasis

Kachroo et al. [2] developed MICROCOSM (MICRObiome contributions on the Complexity Of the Stone Matrix), which focused on the relationship between the microbiome and urolithiasis. The goal of MICROCOSM was to standardize the protocol for microbiome research within the field of urolithiasis to minimize the technical biases and barriers related to microbiome studies. Similar results were found in studies comparing the microbiomes of patients with stones with the microbiomes of healthy controls. On the other hand, despite some apparent differences between patients with stones and healthy controls [38], there were inconsistencies in the compositions of the microbiomes correlating with the disease [2]. MICROCOSM was developed to minimize the discrepancies in microbiome research resulting from experimental factors, such as sample collection, storage, DNA extraction, sequencing, or data analysis.

7. Probiotics for Prevention of Nephrolithiasis

The endogenous digestive microbiome, which utilizes oxalate, potentially prevents oxalate absorption [50]. On the other hand, studies with probiotics, including Oxalobacter, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium, showed disappointing results [33].

1) Probiotics containing Lactobacillus

A pilot study with Oxadrop® reduced urine oxalate excretion by 40% in mildly hyperoxaluric CaOx stone patients [51]. In subsequent research, 10 patients with enteric hyperoxaluria were treated daily with Oxadrop® and received 4 g, 8 g, and 12 g each month for three months [52]. This study showed a dose-dependent effect until the second month. The patients administered 4 g and 8 g exhibited a 19% and 24% decrease in urine oxalate excretion, respectively. On the other hand, during the third month, at 12 g per day, urine oxalate excretion increased in four out of 10 patients, which was close to the baseline established without treatment. No effects on urinary oxalate excretion were observed in a randomized, placebo-controlled study [53].

2) Probiotics containing Oxalobacter

Research in a mouse model of type 1 primary hyperoxaluria demonstrated that oral administration of O. formigenes might decrease urinary oxalate excretion [54]. In a pilot study of nine patients (five with normal renal function, four with primary hyperoxaluria), urine oxalate excretion was reduced by 50% for four weeks by admin-istering an oral preparation of O. formigenes in four with primary hyperoxaluria patients [55]. In this study, three out of five patients with normal renal function exhibited a 22-48% decrease in urinary oxalate excretion while taking the first oral formulation of O. formigenes. Moreover, O. formigenes did not establish persistent gut colonies, so the beneficial effects depended on the continual administration of probiotics. Despite the hopeful preliminary data, there was no follow-up controlled trial using O. formigenes in patients with enteric or idiopathic hyperoxaluria. Therefore, the effect of probiotics containing O. formigenes on urinary oxalate excretion requires more investigation [33]. 

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of O. formigenes may cause enteric hyperoxaluria, but the colonization rate of O. formigenes varies in healthy people and urinary stone patients. Furthermore, the presence of Faecalibacterium, Enterobacter, and Dorea in stone formers may reduce the likelihood that CaOx stones will form. Faecalibacterium may attenuate the inflammation and oxidative stress associated with stone formation. In mice, urine E. coli could promote CaOx stone formation. On the other hand, CaOx stones do not contain large amounts of microorganisms, and no organisms were present in uric acid and cystine stones. A standardized study on the correlation between the stool and urine microbiome and stone formation is currently ongoing, and the effects of probiotics on oxalate degradation require more research. The microbiome likely plays a role in forming nephrolithiasis, but more research will be needed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This paper was supported by Wonkwang University in 2021.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

H.D.J. and J.Y.L. participated in data collection, designed the study, and wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References
  1. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016;69:468-74.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Kachroo N, Lange D, Penniston KL, Stern J, Tasian G, Bajic P, et al. Standardization of microbiome studies for urolithiasis: an international consensus agreement. Nat Rev Urol 2021;18:303-11.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Lederberg J, McCray AT. 'Ome sweet 'omics - a genealogical treasury of words. Scientist 2001;15:8.
  4. Tang J. Microbiome in the urinary system-a review. AIMS Microbiol 2017;3:143-54.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Hilt EE, McKinley K, Pearce MM, Rosenfeld AB, Zilliox MJ, Mueller ER, et al. Urine is not sterile: use of enhanced urine culture techniques to detect resident bacterial flora in the adult female bladder. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:871-6.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Lewis DA, Brown R, Williams J, White P, Jacobson SK, Marchesi JR, et al. The human urinary microbiome; bacterial DNA in voided urine of asymptomatic adults. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2013;3:41.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Thomas-White K, Brady M, Wolfe AJ, Mueller ER. The bladder is not sterile: history and current discoveries on the urinary microbiome. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 2016;11:18-24.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Whiteside SA, Razvi H, Dave S, Reid G, Burton JP. The microbiome of the urinary tract--a role beyond infection. Nat Rev Urol 2015;12:81-90.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 2012;486:215-21.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Nelson DE, Van Der Pol B, Dong Q, Revanna KV, Fan B, Easwaran S, et al. Characteristic male urine microbiomes associate with asymptomatic sexually transmitted infection. PLoS One 2010;5:e14116.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Siddiqui H, Nederbragt AJ, Lagesen K, Jeansson SL, Jakobsen KS. Assessing diversity of the female urine microbiota by high throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons. BMC Microbiol 2011;11:244.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Wolfe AJ, Toh E, Shibata N, Rong R, Kenton K, Fitzgerald M, et al. Evidence of uncultivated bacteria in the adult female bladder. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:1376-83.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Aggarwal KP, Narula S, Kakkar M, Tandon C. Nephrolithiasis: molecular mechanism of renal stone formation and the critical role played by modulators. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:292953.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Wang Z, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Deng Q, Liang H. Recent advances on the mechanisms of kidney stone formation (review). Int J Mol Med 2021;48:149.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Daudon M, Frochot V. Crystalluria. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53 Suppl 2:s1479-87.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Fleisch H. Inhibitors and promoters of stone formation. Kidney Int 1978;13:361-71.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Robertson WG. Pathophysiology of stone formation. Urol Int 1986;41:329-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Randall A. The origin and growth of renal calculi. Ann Surg 1937;105:1009-27.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Evan AP, Lingeman JE, Coe FL, Worcester EM. Role of interstitial apatite plaque in the pathogenesis of the common calcium oxalate stone. Semin Nephrol 2008;28:111-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  20. Kok DJ, Khan SR. Calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis, a free or fixed particle disease. Kidney Int 1994;46:847-54.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Evan AE, Lingeman JE, Coe FL, Miller NL, Bledsoe SB, Sommer AJ, et al. Histopathology and surgical anatomy of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and calcium phosphate stones. Kidney Int 2008;74:223-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Evan AP, Coe FL, Lingeman JE, Shao Y, Matlaga BR, Kim SC, et al. Renal crystal deposits and histopathology in patients with cystine stones. Kidney Int 2006;69:2227-35.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Evan AP, Lingeman J, Coe F, Shao Y, Miller N, Matlaga B, et al. Renal histopathology of stone-forming patients with distal renal tubular acidosis. Kidney Int 2007;71:795-801.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Savage DC. Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract. Annu Rev Microbiol 1977;31:107-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, McInnes P, Wang L, et al; NIH HMP Working Group. The NIH human microbiome project. Genome Res 2009;19:2317-23.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012;486:207-14.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Knight J, Deora R, Assimos DG, Holmes RP. The genetic composition of Oxalobacter formigenes and its relationship to colonization and calcium oxalate stone disease. Urolithiasis 2013;41:187-96.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Kwak C, Jeong BC, Kim HK, Kim EC, Chox MS, Kim HH. Molecular epidemiology of fecal Oxalobacter formigenes in healthy adults living in Seoul, Korea. J Endourol 2003;17:239-43.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Mittal RD, Kumar R, Mittal B, Prasad R, Bhandari M. Stone composition, metabolic profile and the presence of the gut-inhabiting bacterium Oxalobacter formigenes as risk factors for renal stone formation. Med Princ Pract 2003;12:208-13.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Dawson KA, Allison MJ, Hartman PA. Isolation and some characteristics of anaerobic oxalate-degrading bacteria from the rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 1980;40:833-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Allison MJ, Dawson KA, Mayberry WR, Foss JG. Oxalobacter formigenes gen. nov., sp. nov.: oxalate-degrading anaerobes that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract. Arch Microbiol 1985;141:1-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Miller AW, Dearing D. The metabolic and ecological interactions of oxalate-degrading bacteria in the mammalian gut. Pathogens 2013;2:636-52.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Lieske JC. Probiotics for prevention of urinary stones. Ann Transl Med 2017;5:29.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Siener R, Bangen U, Sidhu H, Hönow R, von Unruh G, Hesse A. The role of Oxalobacter formigenes colonization in calcium oxalate stone disease. Kidney Int 2013;83:1144-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Ticinesi A, Milani C, Guerra A, Allegri F, Lauretani F, Nouvenne A, et al. Understanding the gut-kidney axis in nephrolithiasis: an analysis of the gut microbiota composition and functionality of stone formers. Gut 2018;67:2097-106.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Zhou C, Li K, Zhao L, Li W, Guo Z, Xu J, et al. The relationship between urinary stones and gut microbiomeby 16S sequencing. Biomed Res Int 2020;2020:1582187.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Assimos DG. Re: understanding the gut-kidney axis in nephrolithiasis: an analysis of the gut microbiota composition and functionality of stone formers. J Urol 2018;200:940-1.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Batagello CA, Monga M, Miller AW. Calcium oxalate urolithiasis: a case of missing microbes? J Endourol 2018;32:995-1005.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Lee JA, Stern JM. Understanding the link between gut microbiome and urinary stone disease. Curr Urol Rep 2019;20:19.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Barr-Beare E, Saxena V, Hilt EE, Thomas-White K, Schober M, Li B, et al. The interaction between enterobacteriaceae and calcium oxalate deposits. PLoS One 2015;10:e0139575.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. De Ferrari ME, Macaluso M, Brunati C, Pozzoli R, Colussi G. Hypocitraturia and Ureaplasma urealyticum urinary tract infection in patients with idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:1185.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Schwaderer AL, Wolfe AJ. The association between bacteria and urinary stones. Ann Transl Med 2017;5:32.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Bichler KH, Eipper E, Naber K, Braun V, Zimmermann R, Lahme S. Urinary infection stones. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2002;19:488-98.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Frang D, Götz F, Nagy Z, Gimes L, Kocsis B. Study of infective (secondary) renal calculus formation in vitro. Int Urol Nephrol 1981;13:41-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Silverman DE, Stamey TA. Management of infection stones: the Stanford experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 1983;62:44-51.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Tavichakorntrakool R, Prasongwattana V, Sungkeeree S, Saisud P, Sribenjalux P, Pimratana C, et al. Extensive characterizations of bacteria isolated from catheterized urine and stone matrices in patients with nephrolithiasis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012;27:4125-30.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Thompson RB, Stamey TA. Bacteriology of infected stones. Urology 1973;2:627-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Wang X, Krambeck AE, Williams JC Jr, Tang X, Rule AD, Zhao F, et al. Distinguishing characteristics of idiopathic calcium oxalate kidney stone formers with low amounts of Randall's plaque. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;9:1757-63.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  49. Dornbier RA, Bajic P, Van Kuiken M, Jardaneh A, Lin H, Gao X, et al. The microbiome of calcium-based urinary stones. Urolithiasis 2020;48:191-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Ferraz RR, Marques NC, Froeder L, Menon VB, Siliano PR, Baxmann AC, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium breve on urinary oxalate excretion in nephrolithiasis patients. Urol Res 2009;37:95-100.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Campieri C, Campieri M, Bertuzzi V, Swennen E, Matteuzzi D, Stefoni S, et al. Reduction of oxaluria after an oral course of lactic acid bacteria at high concentration. Kidney Int 2001;60:1097-105.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Lieske JC, Goldfarb DS, De Simone C, Regnier C. Use of a probiotic to decrease enteric hyperoxaluria. Kidney Int 2005;68:1244-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Lieske JC, Tremaine WJ, De Simone C, O'Connor HM, Li X, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Diet, but not oral probiotics, effectively reduces urinary oxalate excretion and calcium oxalate supersaturation. Kidney Int 2010;78:1178-85.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Hatch M, Gjymishka A, Salido EC, Allison MJ, Freel RW. Enteric oxalate elimination is induced and oxalate is normalized in a mouse model of primary hyperoxaluria following intestinal colonization with Oxalobacter. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2011;300:G461-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Hoppe B, Beck B, Gatter N, von Unruh G, Tischer A, Hesse A, et al. Oxalobacter formigenes: a potential tool for the treatment of primary hyperoxaluria type 1. Kidney Int 2006;70:1305-11.
    Pubmed CrossRef


August 2021, 16 (2)

  • The official journal of

    The Korean Association of Urogenital Tract Infection and Inflammation

    The Korean Continence Society

    The Han-nam Urological Association

    The Korean Society of Geriatric Urological Care